Review room demo path
Walk one static question until the evidence says stop.
This concept-level path shows how a visitor can move through the existing review room, agenda, proof-path, packet, checklist, limitation, validation, and owner follow-up surfaces without inferring a live product workflow.
Public claim level: concept. No public conclusion without evidence. The path is an authored reading flow for deterministic static evidence. It is not a queue, packet generator, proof engine, or self-running review surface.
Static question
Use the path for one authored public-safe question.
Question shapeCan this public claim be repeated from visible static evidence, or should it be downgraded, kept internal, routed to an owner, or stopped?
Evidence shapeEach conclusion needs a proof path, rule ID or rule family, evidence tier, coverage label, limitation, non-claim, public claim level, public-safe source context, next owner, and validation evidence.
Boundary shapeQuestions about live behavior, release decisions, operations, incidents, endpoint measurements, or private material leave this public path and become owner follow-up. The path keeps the visitor inside public-safe reading steps until a missing field or unsupported claim requires a handoff.
Guided path
Nine steps stay together from question to stop.
| Step label | Visitor action | Required evidence field or route | Allowed outcome | Limitation | Next owner or next route | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| choose a static question | Choose one public-safe static question about whether a claim has visible evidence. | Public claim level, public-safe source context, and a draft claim label. | continue | The question cannot ask whether a live system is acceptable or whether a release can proceed. | documentation owner prepares the wording; next route is the review room. | Stop if the question needs private-only support, raw material, or an operational answer. |
| open the review room | Open the review room to keep known, partial, and missing static evidence separate. | Review room, proof path, coverage label, limitation, and next owner. | continue | The room frames a concept-level conversation and does not create a shipped workflow. | evidence owner carries the question to the meeting agenda. | Stop if no public proof path or coverage label can be named for the question. |
| inspect the agenda | Use the meeting agenda to preserve question, proof, tier, coverage, limitation, gap, owner, and handoff fields. | Meeting agenda, rule ID or rule family, evidence tier, coverage label, limitation, and validation evidence. | continue | Agenda rows organize human review; they cannot strengthen missing or private evidence. | manager/reviewer owner sends the question to proof paths. | Stop if the agenda cannot keep rule, tier, limitation, and owner fields attached. |
| inspect proof paths | Inspect proof paths and the guided proof-path tour for the cited claim. | Proof paths, tour, rule ID or rule family, evidence tier, and proof-path status. | downgrade | Proof-path status must stay visible; syntax-only, unknown, or reduced coverage cannot be upgraded. | source owner or validation owner resolves missing proof before packet review. | Stop if proof path, rule family, evidence tier, or validation evidence is absent. |
| inspect an evidence packet | Inspect the public-safe evidence packet, packet assembly checklist, and packet examples. | Packet guide, assembly checklist, or examples with proof path, tier, coverage, limitation, owner, and validation evidence. | internal only | Packet language describes human-readable public-safe packet surfaces, not raw artifacts or generated packet-builder behavior. | demo owner and evidence owner keep public-safe packet fields visible. | Stop if no public-safe packet route or substitute exists for the claim. |
| run the claim checklist | Run the claim checklist before reusing the wording. | Claim checklist, non-claim, public claim level, coverage label, limitation, and next owner. | downgrade | The checklist can downgrade or route unsupported wording, but it cannot upgrade unsupported evidence. | documentation owner updates wording; validation owner supplies missing evidence. | Stop if the checklist finds missing limitation, missing coverage label, or unsupported wording. |
| check limitations and non-claims | Check limitations and validation before carrying the claim forward. | Limitations, validation, non-claim, validation evidence, and public-safe source context. | owner follow-up | Unsupported runtime, production, release, safety, AI/LLM, broad-coverage, and private/raw claims must be downgraded, removed, or routed. | runtime owner, release reviewer, validation owner, or service owner takes the next question outside this public path. | Stop if wording depends on unsupported live, release, operational, private, or AI/LLM claims. |
| route unresolved questions to owners | Route unresolved questions through owner follow-up using role labels only. | Owner follow-up, next owner, limitation, gap, and stop condition. | owner follow-up | Routing transfers responsibility for the next review step; it does not prove, approve, diagnose, validate, or clear a claim. | evidence owner, site owner, demo owner, source owner, test owner, runtime owner, service owner, database owner, release reviewer, validation owner, documentation owner, or manager/reviewer owner. | Stop if there is no role-based next owner for an unresolved question. |
| stop when evidence is insufficient | End the public path and record the missing evidence instead of finishing the story. | Stop condition, limitation, non-claim, public claim level, and owner route. | stop | Insufficient evidence prevents a public conclusion, even when the path would be easier to finish. | manager/reviewer owner chooses whether to wait, keep the question internal, or ask an evidence owner for a public-safe summary. | Final stop: missing proof path, rule family, tier, coverage label, limitation, validation evidence, public-safe packet route, or next owner prevents a public conclusion. |
Proof and packet fields
Every conclusion carries its evidence fields or stops.
proof pathPublic route or checked public demo path that a visitor can inspect.rule ID or rule familyDeterministic rule context behind the static evidence.evidence tierUse only Tier1Semantic, Tier2Structural, Tier3SyntaxOrTextual, or Tier4Unknown.coverage labelCarry the label from the cited public-safe surface without strengthening it.limitationVisible boundary for what the evidence cannot support.non-claimSpecific wording the path refuses to repeat from static evidence.public claim levelConcept remains concept unless a future public-safe proof packet justifies a different level.public-safe source contextCommit SHA, extractor version, public route, report-family name, sanitized file path, and line span only when already public-safe.next ownerRole label that owns the next question, not a private person or team name.validation evidenceChecked public validation category or visible limitation when evidence is unavailable.Stop conditions
Stopping is a valid review outcome.
- Stop when proof path, rule ID or rule family, evidence tier, coverage label, limitation, or validation evidence is missing.
- Stop when support is private-only without a public-safe summary.
- Stop when the public path would expose raw artifact material, raw facts streams, SQLite databases, analyzer logs, source snippets, SQL, configuration values, secrets, local paths, raw remotes, generated directories, private names, hidden validation detail, or credential-like values.
- Stop before unsupported runtime behavior, production traffic, endpoint performance, outage cause, live diagnosis, production proof, release approval, release safety, operational safety, safe-to-ship, absence-of-impact, complete coverage, AI impact analysis, LLM analysis, prompt classification, embeddings, vector databases, intelligent impact, or smart impact wording.
- Stop when no next owner is assigned or no public-safe packet route or substitute exists.
Non-claims
The path is a public reading guide, not a decision system.
- It does not prove runtime behavior, production traffic, endpoint performance, outage cause, release approval, release safety, operational safety, production proof, live workflow completeness, or complete product coverage.
- It does not provide AI impact analysis, LLM analysis, prompt-based proof, embeddings, vector database reasoning, autonomous review, autonomous approval, or automated management decisions.
- It does not replace source review, ownership decisions, tests, telemetry, logs, traces, incident response, release controls, manager judgment, service ownership, database ownership, site author review, or human validation.
- It does not publish raw source, SQL, configuration values, secrets, local absolute paths, raw repository remotes, generated scan directories, private sample names, hidden validation detail, private owner names, raw command output, or ignored output paths.
Adjacent routes
Follow existing public-safe surfaces only.
review roomConcept-level static evidence room and boundary framing.
meeting agendaMeeting script for question, proof path, tier, coverage, limitation, gap, owner, and handoff fields.
proof paths and guided proof-path tourProof inspection routes that keep status, rule context, tiers, and limitations visible.
evidence packet, packet assembly, and packet examplesPublic-safe packet surfaces for human-readable fields.
claim checklistRepeat, downgrade, route, internal-only, or stop decision support for wording.
limitations and validationBoundary and validation context for unsupported claims and missing evidence.
owner follow-upRole-based routing for unresolved questions.
demo orientation, demo start here, demo evidence trail, demo proof assets, demo result, demo runbook, and demo troubleshootingDemo-safe context without claims about live product scope.