Static evidence beside telemetry

Static repository evidence and runtime observability answer different questions.

TraceMap provides deterministic static repository evidence from a repository snapshot: rule IDs, evidence tiers, file paths, line spans, commit SHA, extractor versions, coverage labels, and limitations. Runtime observability remains the source for live behavior, traffic, performance, alerts, timelines, and operational interpretation.

Public claim level: concept. No public conclusion without evidence. This page explains boundaries; it does not describe a TraceMap runtime agent, telemetry ingestion path, live dashboard, incident automation, or observability replacement.

Static questions

TraceMap starts from a repository snapshot.

Evidence shapeRule ID, evidence tier, file path, line span, commit SHA, extractor version, coverage label, limitation, and snippet hash where public-safe.
Code surfacesEndpoint or route references, contract surfaces, package references, project/configuration surfaces, SQL-facing references, and nearby static references.
UnknownsReduced coverage, syntax-only fallback, unavailable semantic proof, and analysis gaps stay labeled instead of being treated as complete coverage.

Different questions

Use static evidence for code context; use runtime systems for production behavior.

Static evidence can prepare a review packet, but runtime observability and owners remain responsible for live-system conclusions.
Static evidence question TraceMap evidence shape Runtime question Runtime system owner Limitation
Where is this surface visible in the scanned commit? Repository snapshot, commit SHA, route or endpoint reference, file path, line span, rule ID, evidence tier, and coverage label. Which requests actually ran in production? Runtime telemetry, logs, traces, metrics, dashboards, alerts, and service-owner interpretation. Static references are review input, not traffic proof.
Which contract, package, config, project, or SQL-facing references are nearby? Deterministic facts, extractor version, artifact family, limitation, and analysis-gap rows when proof is partial. How did the endpoint perform under load, and did requests error? APM, production metrics, trace sampling, error monitoring, tests, and the owning team. TraceMap does not prove endpoint performance, runtime errors, or operational safety.
What should reviewers inspect next? Static path, nearby evidence, gap label, public-safe proof path, and follow-up owner field in the handoff note. What happened during the incident timeline? Incident dashboards, alert history, logs, traces, incident command, release records, and human review. TraceMap does not determine outage cause, incident root cause, priority, service ownership, or release approval.

Handoff workflow

Keep the static packet useful without turning it into runtime proof.

Before runtime review

Name the surface, scan scope, commit SHA, rule IDs, evidence tiers, coverage labels, and known gaps so runtime owners know what static context is being handed over.

During handoff

Separate static references from operational questions. Ask runtime owners to check logs, traces, metrics, dashboards, alerts, tests, request behavior, and service context.

After runtime review

Attach runtime conclusions to their own systems of record, then use TraceMap static evidence for follow-up code inspection, not for production certainty.

Manager and reviewer readout

Read the packet as bounded static evidence.

rule idWhich deterministic rule produced the fact, and where are the rule limitations documented?
evidence tierWas the finding semantic, structural, syntax/textual, or an explicit unknown?
file spanWhich public-safe file path and line span locate the static reference without publishing source snippets?
scan identityWhich commit SHA and extractor version produced the row?
coverage labelIs the scan complete for the stated scope, reduced, partial, syntax-only, or unavailable?
follow-up ownerWho owns the next runtime, test, service-owner, incident-response, or release-process question?

Non-claims

The static packet does not become operational certainty.

Publishing boundary

Public examples stay summarized and public-safe.

Safe summary layerArtifact families, public-safe summaries, proof-path pages, rule IDs, evidence tiers, coverage labels, limitations, commit SHA, line spans, and extractor versions when a public proof path backs them.
Local-only materialDo not publish raw fact streams, local SQLite indexes, analyzer logs, source excerpts, database query text, configuration values, secrets, local paths, repository remotes, generated scan directories, private sample identities, telemetry payloads, incident timelines, customer data, service names, or production identifiers.
Concept examplesRuntime examples on this page are generic. Missing proof paths remain visible limitations rather than evidence-backed examples.