Before runtime review
Name the surface, scan scope, commit SHA, rule IDs, evidence tiers, coverage labels, and known gaps so runtime owners know what static context is being handed over.
Static evidence beside telemetry
TraceMap provides deterministic static repository evidence from a repository snapshot: rule IDs, evidence tiers, file paths, line spans, commit SHA, extractor versions, coverage labels, and limitations. Runtime observability remains the source for live behavior, traffic, performance, alerts, timelines, and operational interpretation.
Public claim level: concept. No public conclusion without evidence. This page explains boundaries; it does not describe a TraceMap runtime agent, telemetry ingestion path, live dashboard, incident automation, or observability replacement.
Static questions
Different questions
| Static evidence question | TraceMap evidence shape | Runtime question | Runtime system owner | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where is this surface visible in the scanned commit? | Repository snapshot, commit SHA, route or endpoint reference, file path, line span, rule ID, evidence tier, and coverage label. | Which requests actually ran in production? | Runtime telemetry, logs, traces, metrics, dashboards, alerts, and service-owner interpretation. | Static references are review input, not traffic proof. |
| Which contract, package, config, project, or SQL-facing references are nearby? | Deterministic facts, extractor version, artifact family, limitation, and analysis-gap rows when proof is partial. | How did the endpoint perform under load, and did requests error? | APM, production metrics, trace sampling, error monitoring, tests, and the owning team. | TraceMap does not prove endpoint performance, runtime errors, or operational safety. |
| What should reviewers inspect next? | Static path, nearby evidence, gap label, public-safe proof path, and follow-up owner field in the handoff note. | What happened during the incident timeline? | Incident dashboards, alert history, logs, traces, incident command, release records, and human review. | TraceMap does not determine outage cause, incident root cause, priority, service ownership, or release approval. |
Handoff workflow
Name the surface, scan scope, commit SHA, rule IDs, evidence tiers, coverage labels, and known gaps so runtime owners know what static context is being handed over.
Separate static references from operational questions. Ask runtime owners to check logs, traces, metrics, dashboards, alerts, tests, request behavior, and service context.
Attach runtime conclusions to their own systems of record, then use TraceMap static evidence for follow-up code inspection, not for production certainty.
Manager and reviewer readout
rule idWhich deterministic rule produced the fact, and where are the rule limitations documented?evidence tierWas the finding semantic, structural, syntax/textual, or an explicit unknown?file spanWhich public-safe file path and line span locate the static reference without publishing source snippets?scan identityWhich commit SHA and extractor version produced the row?coverage labelIs the scan complete for the stated scope, reduced, partial, syntax-only, or unavailable?follow-up ownerWho owns the next runtime, test, service-owner, incident-response, or release-process question?Non-claims
Publishing boundary
Proof paths